AELE LAW LIBRARY OF CASE SUMMARIES:
Employment & Labor Law for Public Safety Agencies
Back to list of subjects Back
to Legal Publications Menu
Defamation
A police chief had
a triable defamation claim against the public safety director who published
a report containing an inmate's allegation that the police chief had impregnated
a juvenile prostitute; the director failed to learn that the chief had
undergone a vasectomy. Jackson v. City of Columbus, #2006-2096, 2008-Ohio-1041,
117 Ohio St.3d 328, 883 N.E.2d 1060, 27 IER Cases (BNA) 516, 2008 Ohio
Lexis 558.
Florida appellate
court overturns a defamation jury verdict in favor of a police officer
against his lieutenant. The lieutenant was entitled to absolute immunity
because his statements were within the scope of his authority and duties.
Cassell v. India, #4D06-1716, 2007 Fla. App. Lexis 13001 (4th Dist.).
Police chief's defamation claim against the
mayor is dismissed, even if the mayor acted with malice, a defamation action
against a city official for disciplining the plaintiff was barred by absolute
immunity. Schultea vs. City of Patton Village, #H-06-0666, 2006 U.S. Dist.
Lexis 78381 (S.D. Tex. 2006). {N/R}
Appellate court rejects the claims of a police
chief that he was defamed in a mayoral report. Jackson v. City of Columbus,
#05AP-1035, 2006 Ohio App. Lexis 5166 (10th App. Dist. 2006). {N/R}
Defamatory statements about a police chief
contained in an investigative report ordered by the mayor were protected
by the public interest privilege. Jackson v. City of Columbus, #05AP-1035,
2006 Ohio 5089, 2006 Ohio App. Lexis 5019 (10th App. Dist. 2006). {N/R}
During a state police investigation, police
employees' claims of injury to their reputations must fail because there
were no adverse personnel actions, such as a loss of pay or benefits, changed
working conditions, demotions or terminations. Heller v. Fulare, #04-265J,
2006 U.S. Dist. Lexis 69162 (W.D. Pa. 2006), on remand from 454 F.3d 174
(3d Cir. 2006). {N/R}
Ex Florida deputy and his wife awarded $1,231,700
million against the county. The plaintiffs were falsely accused of bringing
drugs into the jail -- and management allegedly botched the internal investigation.
Femminella v. Palm Beach County, Docket #50-204 CA 002604, CFN 20060081517
(15th Circuit Court, Fla.). [2006 FP Jun]
Fourth Circuit refuses to dismiss defamation suit
brought by a former Army scientist who was identified as a "person
of interest" in the 2001 anthrax killings. Hatfill v. N.Y. Times Co.,
#04-2561, 427 F.3d 253, 2005 U.S. App. Lexis 22397 (4th Cir. 2005). {N/R}
Second Circuit affirms the dismissal of a
lawsuit filed by 23 police officers who claimed that their reputations
were harmed by the release of an internal investigative Report. None of
the plaintiffs were named in the Report, and the chief was not a party
to the lawsuit. Algarin v. Town of Wallkill, #04-2607, 421 F.3d 137, 2005
U.S. App. Lexis 18762 (2nd Cir. 2005). [2005 FP Nov]
Canadian police chief receives a settlement
of Can-$5,000 [US-$4,000] from a couple who anonymously published a web
blog that that accused him of being a "rotten apple" and heading
a "corrupt" administration. Beaton v. Fisher, Queen's Bench,
Alberta. Source: CBC News and Calgary Sun (30 Apr. 2005). {N/R}
Appellate court holds that a police officer
and his wife could sue because of statements, made on a radio show, that
he had stabbed another officer and had engaged in an extra-marital affair.
The statements were defamatory per se because they alleged criminal activity
and serious sexual misconduct. Gordon v. Boyles, #02CA2196, 99 P.3d 75
(Colo. App. 2004). {N/R}
Internal performance reports of a probationary
officer that were not made public cannot be the basis for a defamation
claim. Luy v. Baltimore Police Dept., #CCB-03-2833, 326 F.Supp.2d 682 (D.Md.
2004). {N/R}
Connecticut Supreme Court holds that citizen complaints
made to an internal affairs office are protected from defamation lawsuits,
even if deliberately false. Craig v. Stafford, #SC 17073, 271 Conn. 78,
856 A.2d 372, 2004 Conn. Lexis 361 (2004).[2005 FP Jan]
Iowa Supreme Court sustains a verdict of
$96,000 in compensatory and $60,000 in punitive damages for a woman deputy
who sued a male deputy for sending an altered photo of her, in uniform,
with her breasts exposed. The justices also reversed a trial court order
dismissing the county and the sheriff from liability for negligent retention
of the male officer. Kiesau v. Bantz, #03-0815, 686 N.W.2d 164, 2004 Iowa
Sup. Lexis 229 and 256 (2004). [2004 FP Dec]
Iowa Supreme Court holds that prosecutorial
immunity does not apply to a county attorney who told a police chief and
a mayor that he would not prosecute any cases involving the office because
he had lied to investigators about his wife's death. The officer was fired
and sued the county attorney for defamation, interference with employment
contract, and unlawful dissemination of "intelligence data."
Beck v. Phillips, #76/03-0645, 685 N.W.2d 637, 2004 Iowa Sup. Lexis 228
(Iowa 2004). {N/R}
Appeals court rejects a defamation claim
by a worker who was fired after a background investigation revealed possible
criminal conduct. The signed release barred any lawsuit, even if the firm
that oversaw the investigation did not have a state license to conduct
investigations. McCleskey v. Vericon Resources, #A03A1066, 2003 Ga. App.
Lexis 1376, 20 IER Cases (BNA) 1065 (2003). [2004 FP Feb]
Federal court rejects a civil rights lawsuit
filed by officers who complain that an internal investigation of the behavior
was biased, but they may be able to prove that statements made by an investigator
were defamatory. Keim v. Co. of Bucks, 275 F.Supp.2d 628, 2003 U.S. Dist.
Lexis 13926 (E.D. Pa. 2003). [Dec FP 2003]
Federal appeals court holds that a county
is not liable under §1983 for public statements made by a member of
the county board of commissioners concerning the job performance of a county
employee. Also, under state law, the commissioner was entitled to absolute
immunity for his statements. LaVerdure v. Co. of Montgomery, #02-2773,
2003 U.S. App. Lexis 6547 (3rd Cir. 2003). {N/R}
Prison warden could not sue a Connecticut
newspaper in Virginia for posting allegedly defamatory matter on its website.
"A court in Virginia cannot constitutionally exercise jurisdiction
over the Connecticut-based newspaper defendants because they did not manifest
an intent to aim their websites or the posted articles at a Virginia audience."
Young v. New Haven Advocate, #01-2340, 2002 U.S. App. Lexis 25535 (4th
Cir. amended 2003). {N/R}
Ninth Circuit upholds the right of a police
officer to sue entertainer George Michael for slander and the intentional
infliction of emotional distress. The singer accused the undercover officer
of provoking Michael's lewd conduct in a public toilet. Rodriguez v. Panayiotou,
#00-56923, 2002 U.S. App. Lexis 24352 (9th Cir. 2002). [2003 FP Feb]
Federal appeals court rejects a libel action
brought by a former FBI official who was accused of having advance knowledge
about the 1998 Pan Am 103 bombing. Revell v. Hoffman, #01-6169, 2002 U.S.
App. Lexis 22624 (10th Cir. 2002). [2003 FP Jan]
Jury awards an applicant for a federal immigration
officer position over $30,000 in compensatory and $500,000 in punitive
damages against a former employer who falsely accused him of theft and
revealing classified military information. Ake v. Hirazumi, #994566, 45
(9) ATLA L. Rptr. (Unpub. Hawaii Cir. Ct. 2002). {N/R}
Public official was not entitled to a court
order compelling a reporter to disclose his source for an allegedly defamatory
article. Weinberger v. Maplewood Review, #C7-01-2021, 2002 Minn. App. Lexis
711 (Minn. App. 2002). {N/R}
California appeals court strikes down a law
that allowed peace officers to sue citizens for knowingly making a false
complaint of misconduct. Walker v. Kiousis, #E029822, 93 Cal.App. 4th 1432,
2001 Cal. App. Lexis 2584, 114 Cal.Rptr.2d 69, 01 C.D.O.S. 10003 (4th Dist.).
[2002 FP Mar]
Court dismisses a suit of a former FBI agent
who was involved the "Travelgate" investigation of White House
staff, brought against a "media commentator," who made various
statements regarding the agent in 1996. The agent was unable to show that
the commentator acted with malice and the federal agent was a limited public
figure. The commentator was entitled to a qualified privilege because there
was a reasonable basis for his statements. Sculimbrene v. Reno, #99-2010,
158 F.Supp.2d 8, 2001 U.S. Dist. Lexis 12307 (D.D.C. 2001). {N/R}
Illinois appeals court holds that complaints
of coworker misconduct are absolutely privileged against lawsuits for reputational
injuries. Busch v. Bates, #5-99-0638, 753 N.E.2d 1184, 2001 Ill. App. Lexis
596. [2001 FP 163]
Appellate court allows a police sergeant
to sue an officer for defamation and economic losses. The officer, of Japanese
origin, had reported to management that the sergeant muttered "fucking
gooks" in his presence. McNamee v. Jenkins, #98-P-2204, 52 Mass. App.
503, 2001 Mass. App. Lexis 883. {N/R}
Sheriff Dept. that provided deputies to accompany
a private employer for the purpose of firing employees was not defamatory.
D'Errico v. DeFazio, 763 A.2d 424 (Pa. Super.). {N/R}
Federal appeals court rejects a suit by a
citizen seeking to overturn a California statute giving a law enforcement
officer the right to sue citizens for making false complaints against them.
Gritchen v. Collier, #99-56940, 2001 U.S. App. Lexis 12869 (9th Cir. 2001)
reversing 73 F.Supp.2d 1148 (C.D. Cal. 1999). {N/R}
Lawsuit filed by a former housing authority
police officer for defamation is dismissed because of statutory immunity.
King v. City of Chicago, #1-99-4123, 2001 Ill. App. Lexis 644 (1st Dist.,
2001). {N/R}
Federal appeals court rejects a suit against
the city filed by a dispatcher who was fired for making a false crime report.
City kept the details of her termination confidential and did not violate
her reputational rights. Hughes v. City of Garland, #99-10482, 2000 U.S.
App. Lexis 1789 (5th Cir.). [2000 FP 51]
A town Selectman's statements about the chief
of police were absolutely privileged from a claim for defamation, where
the statements were made at town meeting, and involved an issue properly
raised at a town meeting. Voelbel v. Town of Bridgewater, 747 A.2d 252,
1999 N.H. Lexis 161, 15 IER Cases (BNA) 1639 (N.H.). {N/R}
A statute permitting police officers to sue
for defamation those who falsely complain about them to their employers
violates the First Amendment. Haddad v. Wall, 107 F.Supp.2d 1230. {N/R}
Illinois appellate court allows a lawfully
terminated sexual harasser to sue his superior and the employer for publicizing
the reason for his dismissal. Parker v. Bank of Marion, 695 N.E.2d 1370,
1998 Ill.App. Lexis 390, 231 Ill. Dec. 251. [1998 FP 149]
Calling a sarcoidosistic worker a "cocksucker
with a two inch dick," a "dago guinea" or a "short,
ugly and stupid Italian" was not defamatory. However, employer could
be sued for a supervisor's same-gender harassing language, creating a hostile
environment. Grillo v. John Alden Ins., 939 F.Supp. 685 (D.Minn. 1996).
{N/R}
Statements accusing police chief of official
misconduct (including corruption, coverups and racial discrimination) were
susceptible of defamatory meaning; councilman's statements were not "personal
opinion." Scott v. Cooper, 640 N.Y.S.2d 248 (A.D. 1996). {N/R}
S.C. Supreme Court upholds $750,000 defamation
verdict awarded to an asst. police chief against the City Administrator.
He was publicly accused of sexual harassment without just cause. Miller
v. City of West Columbia, 1996 S.C. Lexis 86, 471 S.E.2d 683. [1996 FP
132]
Suit against mayor for stating that a police
applicant "flunked" the exam and was a "lunatic" fails.
Suppan v. Kratzer, 660 A.2d 226 (Pa.Cmwlth. 1995). [1996 FP 60]
Employer could be sued for defamation where
the medium was internal company e-mail. Employer announced the plaintiff's
termination to other employees, for "credit card fraud," where
no fraud was intended by the employee. Meloff v NYLIC, 51 F.3d 372/at375-6
(2nd Cir. 1995). {N/R}
Defamation suit was preempted by LMRA. Arbitration
award reinstating the plaintiff precluded a state-law action for damages.
Furillo v. Dana Corp., 150 LRRM 2785 (E.D.Pa. 1995); also see 866 F.Supp.
842 (1994). [1996 FP 35]
Two police officers win $1.2 million for
enduring false rumors they were romantically involved. City took more than
a year to finish the investigation; EEOC requires employers to take prompt
action. Baker v. City of Oceanside, San Diego Co. Super. Ct. #N56730, 33
(1605) G.E.R.R. 341 (1994); Simpson v. City of Oceanside, San Diego Co.
Super. Ct. #N56726 (1994). [1995 FP 85]
Statements made by workers to their employer
during the course of an internal investigation are privileged communications
and cannot be the subject of a suit for defamation, unless they were made
with malice or ill will. Herlihy v. M.M.A., 214 A.D.2d 250, 633 N.Y.S.2d
106 (1995). {N/R}
Appellate court reverses $80,000 judgment
given an ex-employee who claimed it was defamation to terminate her for
misconduct in front of her supervisor. Harrel v. Dillards, 644 N.E.2d 448,
1994 Ill.App. Lexis 1452. [1995 FP 68]
"An employer enjoys a qualified privilege
when commenting on personnel matters to those who have a legitimate and
direct interest in the subject matter of the communication. A company's
employees have a legitimate and direct interest in the reasons for a co-worker's
dismissal." Esmark v. James, 10 F.3d 1156, 1994 U.S. App. Lexis 267,
relying on state law announced in Bulloch v. City of Pascagoula, 574 So.2d
637 (Miss. 1990). {N/R}
IL appellate court declines to hold employers
liable because an internal investigation could have been conducted with
greater skill. "An employer should have the right to directly confront
its employee with allegations of unlawful activity. We will not require
employers to finesse their way around direct allegations of criminal activity
when confronting such employees in order to avoid making a possibly defamatory
statement." Larson v. Decatur, 602 N.E.2d 864, 1992 Ill.App. Lexis
173 {N/R}
Appellate court overturns $250,000 award
to slandered police applicant. Allegation the applicant cheated was untrue,
but made without malice. Dvorak v. O'Flynn, 808 S.W.2d 912 (Mo.App. 1991).
[1992 FP 84]
Sheriff, as a former employer, was privileged
to state his opinion of the applicant to a prospective employer. Introini
v. Richland County, 9 IER Cases (BNA) 1149 (D.S.C. 1993). [1994 FP 163]
Terminated officer could not sue for reputational
injuries because stigmatizing information was put in his employment file.
Even if untrue, prior employer actually must disclose derogatory accusations
before a compensable injury occurs. Johnson v. Martin, 943 F.2d 15 (7th
Cir. 1991). » See also: Bishop v. Wood, 426 U.S. 341, 96 S.Ct. 2074
(1976); Ratliff v. City of Milwaukee, 795 F.2d 612 (7th Cir. 1986). Brandt
v. Bd. of Co-op Educ. Serv., 820 F.2d 41 (2nd Cir. 1987) holds to the contrary.
[1992 FP 52]
Missouri police officer wins $2.25 million
default judgment against the Klan over false allegations of misconduct.
Robinson v. Ku Klux Klan, Greene Co. MO Cir. Ct. (7/18/91), as reported
in the Springfield News-Leader.
Ex-officer who killed UT sniper has sued
TBS to stop reruns of a movie that depicts him as a coward; $14 million
sought in damages. McCoy v. Turner Broadcasting Systems, Inc. U.S. Dist.
Ct. (W.D. Tex. 11/28/90).
Jury awards $210,000 in punitive damages
against former employees who defamed two co-workers by allegations of unlawful
conduct. Cincinnati Bell v. Gates, Cm. Pls. Hamilton Co. #A-8900494 (2/12/90).
Training academy officials hit with $150,000
in punitive damages, plus $100,000 in compensatory damages, for slander
of test candidate; defense unable to prove cheating allegation. [Steve]
Dvorak v. Board of Police Cmsnrs. et al, Circuit Ct. of City of St. Louis
(3/16/90).
Councilman who publicly called chief a "dumb
son-of-a-bitch" and "incompetent" did not commit a slander.
Finck v. City of Tea, 443 N.W.2d 632 (S.D. 1989).
Suit against official for defamation fails,
when his questions and remarks were related to legitimate personnel matters.
Robinson v. Egnor, 699 F.Supp. 1207 (E.D. Va. 1988).
Qualified immunity privilege fails; officer
awarded $10,000 for emotional distress, when defamed at a public meeting.
English Jr. v. Smith Jr., Hampshire County, MA, Superior Court #84-016,
21 Pers. Inj. Verdict Rev. 4 (July, 1988).
Chief could not sue town council or consultant
for publication of a report critical of his leadership. Baumblatt v. Battalia,
520 N.Y.S.2d 471 (A.D. 1987).
A city manager's untrue and defamatory statements,
leading to the termination of a fire chief, cannot form the basis of a
lawsuit; jury award of $74,000 set aside by appellate court. Town of South
Padre Island v. Jacobs, 736 S.W.2d 134 (Reh., Tex.App. 1987).
City could not be sued for libel in connection
with employee's discharge. City of Dallas v. Moreau, 718 S.W.2d 776 (Tex.App.
1986).
Jury awards $675,000 compensatory damages
against city and chief, plus $50,000 punitive against chief for injuring
reputations of subordinates. Giffin and King v. Ortega and City of Phoenix,
Maricopa Co. Sup'r Ct. (5/2/86).
No liability for truthfully answering news
media's questions concerning termination of public employee. Karr v. Townsend,
606 F.Supp. 1121 (W.D. Ark. 1985).
Sheriff not liable for defamation in suit
by ex-deputy where sheriff did not disclose reasons for termination. Karr
v. Townsend, 606 F.Supp. 1121 (W.D. Ark. 1985).
Jury awards $150,000 for emotional distress
and $100,000 punitive damages against sheriff who "defamed" a
deputy; appellate court reduced the awards. Nellis v. Miller, 477 N.Y.S.2d
72 (A.D. 1984); Keller v. City of Reno, 587 F.Supp. 21 (D. Nev. 1984).
Former employer could freely discuss applicant's
work record with prospective employer; slander suit thrown out. City of
Miami v. Wardlow, 403 So.2d 414 (Fla. 1981).
Police officer has the same, but not a greater
right, to bring a lawsuit against a citizen for reputational injuries.
Mesa v. Rodriguez, 357 So.2d 711, 1978 Fla. Lexis 4767. {N/R}
City held liable for defaming fired police
chief; damages to be awarded. Owen v. City of Independence, Missouri, 560
F.2d 925 (9th Cir. 1977), aff'd 100 S.Ct. 1398.
See also: Employer
References-Defamation & Other Claims; Civil
Liability; Free Speech; Wrongful
Discharge.