AELE LAW LIBRARY OF CASE SUMMARIES:
Employment & Labor Law for Public Safety Agencies
Back to list of subjects Back
to Legal Publications Menu
Disciplinary Appeals & Challenges - Reviewing Standards
Appellate panel
reverses a trial court order that overruled an Ohio State Personnel Board
of Review decision that reduced the penalty of a deputy sheriff from termination
to a suspension and reinstatement. The trial court exceeded its authority
by substituting its judgment for that of the Board. Franklin County Sheriff
v. Frazier, #07AP-363, 2007-Ohio-7001, 2007 Ohio App. Lexis 6147 (10th
Dist. 2007).
Utah appellate court
reverses a civil service board ruling that overturned the termination of
a fire captain. The board improperly ignored a sexual harassment allegation
because the subordinate voluntarily participated in the banter. Consent
can affect the degree of punishment, but does not excuse a violation of
agency policy. Ogden City v. Harmon, #20031030-CA, 2005 UT App 274, 116
P.3d 973, 2005Utah App. Lexis 297 (2005). [2006 FP Apr]
Wisconsin
Supreme Court interprets statutes providing judicial review and collective
bargaining to allow a terminated public employee to appeal to the courts,
or force binding arbitration -- but not both. Eau Claire Co. v. Teamsters
L-662, #98-3197, 2000 WI 57, 235 Wis.2d 385, 611 N.W.2d 744. {N/R}
Nevada supreme court reinstates corrections
official who was terminated for improper use of inmate labor. Courts should
not substitute a different penalty if supported by substantial evidence.
Knapp v. Dept. of Prisons, 111 Nev. 420, 892 P.2d 575, 1995 Nev. Lexis
31. [1995 FP 163-4]
Court could not reverse personnel board decision
without statutory review authority. O'Connor v. Oakland Co. Sheriff's Dept.,
426 N.W.2d 816 (Mich. App. 1989).
A police lieutenant, who was fired and reinstated
as a sergeant by the Civil Service Cmsn, could bring a damage action for
"severe anxiety, worry, mental, physical and emotional distress"
for his improper firing by the County. The issue of wrongful termination
need not be relitigated, because of the doctrine of collateral estoppel.
Neither could he seek court-imposed reinstatement at the rank of lieutenant,
for the same reason. Knickerbocker v. City of Stockton, 199 Cal.App.3d
235 at 245 (1988). {N/R}
Right to court review in some states is limited
to a constitutional violation. McFadden v. Gideon, 639 S.W.2d 43 (Tex App.
1982).